Credits: I. Afanassiev (U. of Newfoundland)
E.g. how one can discuss “turbulence” statistical approaches, starting with an image of 2D turbulence, which is intrinsically not “turbulent”: it’s not 3D, it’s irrotational (only one component exists), it’s “impotent” in self-amplification, etc.
my humble $0.02
but read, read ::> http://www.nonequilibrium.net/turbulence-physical-approaches/