<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Like-XPIV image from NASA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/</link>
	<description>"Panta Rhei" (everything flows) but how?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:47:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Liberzon</title>
		<link>http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Liberzon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Creative Commons License is the one to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creative Commons License is the one to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oceanflynn</title>
		<link>http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>oceanflynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexl.wordpress.com/2006/10/16/like-xpiv-image-from-nasa/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Sounds like smoke and mirrors. In a good way. 
You and your students have a highly visible internet presence. I have noticed some of your work seems to have been used by non-profit in derivative works? What do you think of Creative Commons licensing? I have chosen the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License for my own work but then I have just newly immigrated to the blogosphere. I would like to work with one of your images as a background for a visualization of the concept of the &quot;ripple effect.&quot;
I have been searching google images for works that are available in the Creative Commons but of course yours are the most stunning. 

Maureen Flynn-Burhoe
Cowichan Bay, BC, Canada</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like smoke and mirrors. In a good way.<br />
You and your students have a highly visible internet presence. I have noticed some of your work seems to have been used by non-profit in derivative works? What do you think of Creative Commons licensing? I have chosen the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License for my own work but then I have just newly immigrated to the blogosphere. I would like to work with one of your images as a background for a visualization of the concept of the &#8220;ripple effect.&#8221;<br />
I have been searching google images for works that are available in the Creative Commons but of course yours are the most stunning. </p>
<p>Maureen Flynn-Burhoe<br />
Cowichan Bay, BC, Canada</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
